The lawyer who represented two Greek law enforcement officials within the Harry Maguire assault case on Wednesday stated it was “stunning” that there was no apology from the Manchester United captain. Maguire was handed a 21-month suspended jail sentence on Tuesday after being discovered responsible of assaulting a police officer, tried bribery and different costs by a courtroom in Greece. The England defender, who didn’t attend Tuesday’s trial on the Greek island of Syros, rapidly indicated his intention to attraction, releasing a press release suggesting he and his household and associates have been the victims.
Manchester United additionally backed their participant, who denies all the costs.
The 27-year-old –the world’s most costly defender — was arrested final week after an incident at a nightclub in Mykonos and spent two nights in police custody earlier than flying house.
Maguire’s brother Joe and good friend Christopher Sharman have been additionally discovered responsible on a variety of costs and sentenced to 13 months in jail, suspended for 3 years.
Lawyer Ioannis Paradissis stated an apology would, in Greek legislation, make an enormous distinction in any appeals course of however stated none had been provided.
“(The law enforcement officials) advised me they’re nonetheless ready for an apology they usually have not had any,” Paradissis advised the BBC.
“That is what I discover fairly stunning and fairly unsporting. Truthful play means once I’ve executed one thing flawed I apologise or no less than I say I’m sorry for what occurred to the opposite individual.”
Paradissis stated an attraction would begin the trial afresh however that in Greek legislation a number of the accusations could possibly be withdrawn if an apology got and that “the end result could be completely different”.
England withdrawal
England supervisor Gareth Southgate withdrew Maguire from his squad for the Nations League matches towards Iceland and Denmark subsequent month, having initially chosen him on Tuesday.
In accordance with media experiences, a combat began at a nightclub over claims Maguire’s sister Daisy had been injected with what the defence claimed was a suspected drug.
Paradissis stated this was “irrelevant” in respect of the assault on the officers and that it was “unusual” that Maguire’s sister had not talked about this when she was interviewed by police.
Requested about Maguire’s declare that he was the sufferer, Paradissis stated: “We do not have the identical definition of what a sufferer is then, as a result of how will you be a sufferer and the policemen have been assaulted, hit, that have been simply doing their jobs?
“They went house on the day with accidents. How can they not be a sufferer?”
Promoted
Requested whether or not Maguire and his co-defendants would have identified the officers have been police, Paradissis stated: “In fact, as a result of that is the very first thing they stated. The law enforcement officials have been there for different duties they usually heard a brawl.
“In order that they heard some individuals combating and went there to interrupt up a combat. They stated, ‘We’re police, cease combating’. They weren’t in uniform however they confirmed their skilled IDs.”
Source link
