Indrani Mukerjea is presently lodged on the Byculla girls’s jail in Mumbai. (File)
Mumbai:
A particular CBI courtroom in Mumbai rejected the bail plea of Indrani Mukerjea, the prime accused within the Sheena Bora homicide case, noting that the opportunity of the accused influencing prosecution witnesses can’t be dominated out.
After failing to safe bail a number of instances on medical grounds, Indrani Mukerjea in December final yr filed one other plea, looking for bail on “deserves” of the case.
Particular CBI courtroom decide JC Jagdale rejected the plea on Wednesday.
The courtroom noticed that some essential case witnesses like Rahul Mukerjea, son of accused Peter Mukerjea, and Vidhi, daughter of Indrani Mukerjea and her former husband and co-accused Sanjeev Khanna, had been but to be examined.
“There is no such thing as a doubt that the accused is an influential and rich particular person. Subsequently, the opportunity of influencing prosecution witnesses can’t be dominated out,” the decide mentioned.
Whereas arguing for bail, Indrani Mukerjea advised courtroom that the prosecution’s case was “false and baseless” and he or she had almost 120 paperwork to show it.
She submitted that there is no such thing as a scientific proof to show that the crime occurred. She identified inconsistencies within the proof put forth by the prosecution to show her position as a conspirator and one of many killers of her daughter Sheena Bora.
She additionally raised doubt concerning the “credibility and legality” of the probe.
Indrani Mukerjea claimed there are quite a few contradictions within the testimonies of prosecution witnesses, together with accused-turned-approver Shayamwar Rai.
“They’ve both contradicted their very own statements, or the statements of different witnesses, or the prosecutions story itself,” she had submitted.
Nevertheless, the decide in his order noticed that in the course of trial, the courtroom can’t declare that the half proof is both wholly dependable, or partly dependable, or completely unreliable.
“At the moment juncture, the courtroom can’t conclude that the proof led by Shyamvar Rai (approver) has falsified or suffered from deadly infirmities as a result of cross-examination of the mentioned witness,” the courtroom famous.
The decide additional noticed that at this stage, the trial courtroom can’t move a closing conclusion concerning the evidentiary worth of the witnesses.
“In my view, the accused and the advocate involved ought to co-operate with the trial courtroom to complete the mentioned trial,” the decide added.
Indrani Mukerjea is presently lodged on the Byculla girls’s jail in Mumbai.
Final month, the courtroom rejected her one other bail plea, citing the chance of contracting coronavirus within the wake of the illness outbreak within the jail.
24-year-old Sheena Bora was allegedly strangled in a automobile by Indrani Mukerjea, her then driver Shyamvar Rai and Sanjeev Khanna in April 2012. Her physique was then burnt in a forest in neighbouring Raigad district.
Indrani Mukerjea was arrested in August 2015.
Former media baron Peter Mukerjea was additionally later arrested for allegedly being a part of the conspiracy. He’s presently out on bail, which was granted by the Bombay Excessive Courtroom earlier this yr.
His 17-year-old marriage to Indrani Mukerjea ended in the course of the interval of incarceration as the 2 obtained divorced in October final yr.
(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is revealed from a syndicated feed.)
Source link
