Supreme Court docket Wednesday dismissed a plea that questioned organising of judicial fee.
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court docket Wednesday dismissed a plea questioning the organising of a three-member judicial fee, headed by former prime court docket choose Justice BS Chauhan, to inquire into the encounter killing of gangster Vikas Dubey.
A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde stated that there have been sufficient safeguards to make sure truthful inquiry by the judicial panel into the encounter which passed off in Kanpur.
The decision got here on a plea filed by advocate Ghanshyam Upadhaya looking for re-constitution of the inquiry fee and substituting its members — Justice (retd) B S Chauhan, former Supreme Court docket choose, Justice (retd) Shashi Kant Agarwal and retired Uttar Pradesh DGP Ok L Gupta — with different former judges of the highest court docket and retired DGPs.
He had alleged that brother of Justice Chauhan is a legislator in Uttar Pradesh and his daughter is married to a Member of Parliament.
On August 11, the bench additionally comprising justices A Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, had stated that it might not enable anybody to forged aspersions on the idea of media studies on the retired prime court docket choose heading the panel.
It had pulled up the petitioner and requested him whether or not a relative of a choose belonging to a political get together, be termed as an unlawful act.
It had stated that there are a number of judges who’ve Members of Parliament as their kinfolk.
“There are judges whose father or brother or kinfolk are MPs. Are you (petitioner) saying that all of them are biased judges? If any relative is belonging to a political get together, is that this an unlawful act?” the highest court docket had informed Mr Upadhaya.
The highest court docket had earlier dismissed an utility looking for elimination of two different members of the inquiry fee saying that it might not enable the petitioner to forged aspersions.
Source link
