Delhi Lawyer, Fined For Not Carrying Masks Whereas Driving Alone, Recordsdata Case


A lawyer has challenged a 500-rupee penalty by cops for not sporting masks when driving alone

New Delhi:

The Delhi Excessive Courtroom at this time sought response of the Centre and AAP authorities on a lawyer’s plea difficult the Rs 500 wonderful issued to him for not sporting a masks whereas he was driving alone.

Justice Navin Chawla issued discover to the Ministry of Well being and Household Welfare, Delhi authorities, Delhi Catastrophe Administration Authority (DDMA) and the police looking for their stand on the petition which seeks quashing of the penalty, refund of the Rs 500 paid as wonderful and compensation of Rs 10 lakh for psychological harassment suffered by the petitioner.

The petitioner, Saurabh Sharma, has claimed in his plea that on September 9 whereas driving to work he was stopped by Delhi Police officers and was fined for not sporting a masks despite the fact that he was alone within the automobile.

Mr Sharma, represented by advocate KC Mittal, has contended that there’s a Well being Ministry notification clarifying that sporting a masks was not obligatory whereas driving alone in a automobile.

Advocate Farman Ali Magray, showing for the ministry, stated he wants to verify whether or not such a notification has been issued.

Mr Sharma, in his plea, has stated that the officers fining him failed to supply any govt order which makes it necessary to put on masks whereas travelling alone in a non-public automobile.

Additionally they didn’t heed his request to put in writing on the ticket that he was driving alone and he paid the “unlawful” wonderful underneath protest, the petition has stated.

It has contended that within the absence of any regulation or notification making it necessary to put on a masks whereas driving alone in a non-public automobile, the levy of wonderful on him was “ex-facie arbitrary and unlawful”.

Mr Mittal, throughout the listening to, argued that the rules issued by DDMA solely state that the masks needs to be worn in a public place or place of business, and a non-public automobile is neither.

The DDMA contended that its tips issued in April and June this 12 months make it necessary to put on a masks in a public place and added that the Supreme Courtroom has held that a personal automobile is a public place.

It additionally stated that underneath the rules issued by it, there’s a penalty of Rs 500 for first time breach of quarantine norms in addition to for not sporting masks and for each subsequent violation there’s a wonderful of Rs 1,000.

The court docket listed the matter for additional listening to on November 18.

(Aside from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is revealed from a syndicated feed.)

Source link