Prashant Bhushan was discovered responsible of contempt by the highest courtroom earlier this month. (File)
New Delhi:
Lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan has been fined Rs 1 for his tweets criticising the Chief Justice of India SA Bobde. Mr Bhushan, 63, has been requested to pay the nice by September 15, failing which he can be sentenced to 3 months in jail or he can’t work as a lawyer for 3 years.
Earlier this month, the 63-year-old was discovered responsible of contempt by the highest courtroom, which sought an unconditional apology from the lawyer-activist. Mr Bhushan, nonetheless, refused to retract or apologise, sustaining that it will be contempt of his conscience and the courtroom.
His lawyer has argued that that the courtroom should and will take excessive criticism as its “shoulders are broad sufficient”. Legal professional Normal KK Venugopal has additionally argued towards punishment. Sustaining that the judges can’t “go to press to defend themselves or clarify,” the courtroom cited Mr Bhushan’s excessive standing throughout the authorized system. “Had it been another person, it was simpler to disregard,” the courtroom had mentioned.
Listed here are the Dwell Updates on Prashant Bhushan case:
“Freedom of speech can’t be curtailed,” mentioned the Supreme Court docket whereas handing down the sentence, referring to “sane recommendation” from Legal professional Normal KK Venugopal to the courtroom and to Prashant Bhushan.
The 63-year-old had refused to retract his feedback or apologise, sustaining that it will be contempt of his conscience and the courtroom. His lawyer has argued that that the courtroom should and will take excessive criticism as its “shoulders are broad sufficient”.
Prashant Bhushan has been requested to pay the nice by September 15, failing which he can be sentenced to 3 months in jail or he can’t work as a lawyer for 3 years.
Lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan, held responsible of contempt for his tweets criticising the Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and the Supreme Court docket, has been fined Re 1 by the highest courtroom.
Source link
